Issues of Neuroscience

Copyright Notice

All images referenced here are owned by other artists and their use here is in accordance with the "fair use" exemption of the United States Copyright Law. See Fair Use.

Our "Fair use" policy is to only use a work in edited form for educational and scientific purposes. The work is edited to focus on a specific scientific issue, preserve copyright notices when present, and avoid infringing on the commercial value of the original author's work We follow the guidelines of CETUS in obtaining permission to use any work. See Obtaining permission A further acknowledgement, a web link, or a promotional statement with a logo image will be gladly provided upon request. This request may include a promotional reference or acknowledgement provided by the author.
General Directions: EASI Tennis Research in active in the area of Learning, Reasoning, Adaptation, and Self-Awareness.
Issue 1. The Development Process Generally. In tennis training we have observed that the development process proceeds in fits and starts, rather than in a smooth series of improvements. In part, it appears that there is an "oscillation" between utilizing declarative knowledge, and "reflexive" knowledge. Due to the speed of stroke execution, even when slow, this oscillation seems to result in producing a very ragged development path. The exact dynamics of this process should be understood and explained in detail.
Issue 2. Initial Observational Learning. We have observed that a student can be shown a stroke once and then quickly reproduce it. This happens with such regularity that the metaphor of "beginner's luck" provides no reasonable explanation. However, the student will quickly lose this skill and spend a long time before rediscovering it. A precise explanation of how this initial "imprinting" (we use the term "imprinting" rather than observational learning in this case since this learning activity requires very little observation and seems more akin to the imprinting process in children) is rapidly formed, why it is unstable, what is its typical duration (statistical distribution) and what is the mechanism by which the brain moves from the transient "imprint" to a more stable knowledge of a stroke.

Issue 3. Body Dynamics and Visual Processing. Specific body positions seem to lend themselves to better visual processing. For example, if one accurately replicates the position seen in the figures below, we have discovered that the ability to process visual information significantly improves. Of particular significance is the placement of the elbow highlighted in the illustrations below. In particular, does the development of the "correct" components of physical action participate in directing the visual processing to pick up the "right" information to maximize efficient action? In simple terms, does knowing the right actions stimulate the visual system to acquire the right information? While it may seem at first blush that there can be no relationship between body position and visual processing, our experience suggests that there is. This relationship should be the subject of a research program.

All photos used by permission of the copyright holder Brian Mitchell http://www.igs.net/~bmitchell/Tennis/tennis.htm

In particular, is the improvement in visual processing simply a result of the presence of a consistent set of dynamics, or are there movement pathways along which vision is more effective?

Issue 4. The Use of Force in Stroke Production. Many players can be seen to be exerting considerable force in their arms in the execution of their strokes as seen in the images below. Since about 40% of the motor neurons can be found in the sensor cortex it is reasonable to ask what benefit this exertion is providing. It is a fact that it is not essential when the player is not running or scrambling, but it is usually present in professional rallies. In addition, the force illustrated in the figures below cannot contribute substantially to the speed of the ball. One conjecture is that this stress provides somatosensory feedback loop that better locates the position of the arms in three dimensional space. If so, the stress is an essential factor in rallies generally and therefore provides a general value that will benefit the precision of any movement. Another conjecture is that the force provides a stabilizing effect on the stroke at high rally speeds.

All photos used by permission of the copyright holder Brian Mitchell http://www.igs.net/~bmitchell/Tennis/tennis.htm

The exact purpose of this force should be determined scientifically.

Issue 5. Stages of the learning process. It is clear from our work that learning proceeds in stages. This is also intuitively acknowledged by the structure of university education wherein the same material is usually presented in at least three increasingly complex stages. What is the nature of these stages. For example, is there an assembly process followed by a pruning (consolidation) process. Are contradictory and vague assemblies unstable? Does rote training of an imprecise or ambiguous process result in the formation of unadaptable structures?

Issue 6. The Nature of Adaptation. Is adaptability limited by social training? Can adaptability be improved, i.e., can one's ability to be adaptable be improved?
Issue 7. The Nature of Nervousness. What is the nature of nervousness? That is, what are the neurodynamics? For example, is nervousness experienced when two different parts of the brain are unable to interface consistently to carry out an action? What is the origin of our interpretation of the experience of nervousness? Is it social, is it structural, or can it be random?
Issue 8. Stability in Learning. It is possible to learn two contradictory positions about the same topic. However, if one learns two separate components of a physical action in isolation, and if one of the components is learned so that it cannot be interfaced with the second, will the structures formed to execute these components destabilize once one attempts to integrate them and it is discovered (perhaps unconsciously) that they are incompatible.
Issue 9. Visual Processing. Does the accuracy of visual processes require a frame by frame association? That is, from a frame seen, does the body form an association to a previous method of responding to that frame and then carryout that association? If there are no frames to associate to, does the brain begin to construct one while still trying to respond to the current stimulus? Does the frame association process require accurate idea of the objective of the observer in order to make the right association?